Hi, I thought I'd share a picture of the top on my new E1OM (built in 2022). I read in another thread that Eastman were putting thermo-cured tops in some of their lower models, as they had run out their regular stock of seasoned spruce. This top certainly has that look to me, with it's golden hue. 

However, a friend of mind pointed out that the top looks more like Adirondack than Sitka, with its wider grain, especially in the lower bout. I wouldn't know, but when I looked at the pictures on the Eastman website, my top looks more like the Adirondack examples than the Sitka examples. 

I'm just posting this out of interest -- not making any claims... Have a great day.

Attached Files

image1.jpeg

File size: 2.47 MB

Downloads: 118

Fretboard slopes towards the neck pickup. Anyone else notice this? Are you having hassles with notes ringing out/dead while on the 21st fret?

! was on the Eastman group site on facebook and it just substantiates why I despise superlative descriptions of various models that I have owned or played or anything/brand model. Maybe it just takes a whole lot more to impress me to to the point of salivating over a guitar. I like my Eastmans just fine but that enough, just fine...but amazing, best I've ever played, a beast on and on. The reason why a persons review means absolutely nothing to me.

IMO altho I have little experience with other brands. I'm thinking Eastman build quality is just as good or better than many or most brands. And their pricing is exceptional. I'm a home alone player nowadays, no collector and not wanting to spend a huge amount on an acoustic.

Some folks say they don't see much or any difference between 1 11/16 and 1 3/4 nut size. I'm not one of those folks. A 1 11/16 nut size is just too close for my likes as my fingers come too close to the strings and I can't have my fingers touch a string muting it in any way and it happens with the slim nut. All of Eastman's SS models have the 1 11/16 nut so even if I were interested in that body size and build the slim nut eliminates any consideration.

As I've said before neck depth is too slim for my ultimate likes. I really like the C shape but not the slim neck depth. I really wish they made a neck a little fuller. It would be so so much more comfortable for me. I have an E10 OM and I like the guitar fine except for the slim neck depth. I hear all kind of excuses for why the builds are like this and I hear where folks say their neck vary in depths because of the different builders Eastman has. I don't want to have to go through all the trouble of trying out a dozen guitars hoping to find one that was built with a thicker neck depth by a particular builder or whoever shapes the necks for Eastman. 

Don't know who makes the decisions at Eastman on builds, whoever it is I don't understand what determines the builds Eastman thinks a majority of buyers prefer. Don't know why so many builds offer only the 1 11/16 nut size. Many folks don't like a slim nut so that results in lost sales simply because of nut size. So to me Eastman is not upping their build game they're decreasing.

Surely it's not just me. Pretty sure I've read here from fans of Eastmans that have bought and sold because they didn't care for a build aspect. Sure would be nice if Eastman had some sort of communication with buyers instead of assuming by whatever means what people were most interested in. 

I'm sure my post aggravates and t's folks off and I really like Eastman, maybe Eastman will give me a straight shooting job instead of the tongue wagging bs like every other brand and brand boys has lol. I'd just like to see more out of Eastman and they'd rule the guitar industry.

New to forum.I've been on the look out for an Eastman used om in my area and finally found one at the South Austin Guitar Center.I tried a e20ss at another store Saturday and it just wasn't what I was looking for.When I played the E10om I immediately knew I was walking out with it.It was already set up great.Perfect action for me.Damn what a great guitar.I bought and sould ten guitars in a year or so including 3 Martins and this is the best one yet.

I have owned several Eastman guitars over the last decade or so and I have found that they are an excellent alternative for those of us who can't afford a Martin or a Taylor. However, they seem to be going up in price and are not such great values lately.

I have also purchased a Recording King RD-328 and an RD-342 in the last couple of years. Both have been VERY good in every way. They each have Excellent build quality, beautiful cuts of wood, great low action, and wonderful, rich sound. I would say that I have come to consider these two Recording King guitars the best value in acoustic guitars on the market, beating out Eastman. If you have had some experience with these guitars, I would like to get your opinion.

Thanks,
Clint

Thinking specifically about the black varnish version, wondering if anyone who has one of these models (or the other 'v' finishes) can comment on how rapidly/easily the finish has aged and in what way (checking, 'show-through' spots getting larger, etc.).

I've been told (and read/seen on YT by reviewers) that this finish wears much faster than typical nitro. Some of the SB-59 V's I've seen have more or less aging/wear-through and just curious what owners might have to say about this.

Thinking specifically about the black varnish version, wondering if anyone who has one of these models (or the other 'v' finishes) can comment on how rapidly/easily the finish has aged and in what way (checking, 'show-through' spots getting larger, etc.).

I've been told (and read/seen on YT by reviewers) that this finish wears much faster than typical nitro. Some of the SB-59 V's I've seen have more or less aging/wear-through and just curious what owners might have to say about this.

Just bought a used SB55, anything I should know ?
What's best to clean the finish and fretboard ?

Just wrapped up a new video and wanted to share it with ya all. Written, Produced, Directed and Edited by yours truly. 
Hope you enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYAudR3SY9s

Despite a really bad J-45 experience a few years ago I have been keeping my eye open for one - a pure acoustic. Thing is pretty much every one I spot has a pup fitted, most frequently at the factory. Why? I know the J-45 is a stalwart of the recording world, but is it partly down to the unplugged sound frequently being poor?